Gender Selection News

May 2004 - Posts

  • GenSelect Gender Selection Kit: "Patented" doesn't equal "effective"

    "We were just granted our United States patent, and they don't grant patents to wives' tales."
        -- GenSelect co-founder Jill Sweazy, to CBS News

    Phosita, a blog about patents and intellectual property law, examines the GenSelect patent, and explains that "it is a common misconception that patents are only issued to inventions that actually work... in order to be patentable, a disclosed invention only has to be novel (never done before), nonobvious, and useful."

    GenSelect's US Patents:

    • Nutriceuticals to "improve the natural fertility process"
    • Kit and method for "increasing the chances of conceiving a child having a desired gender"

    This 1989 paper referenced in both patents concludes that "the influence of coital timing on the sex ratio is... not a practical method to alter the sex ratio", yet contrarily the GenSelect Web site insists that timing intercourse and ovulation is "very important in the pre-conception gender selection process".